CHAPTER XXXII D



D —General provisions regarding execution
425. Who may issue warrant.
Every warrant for the execution of a sentence may be issued either by the Judge or Magistrate
who passed the sentence, or by his successor-in-officer.
426. Sentence on escaped convict when to take effect -
(1) When a sentence of death, imprisonment for life or fine is passed under this Code on an
escaped convict, such sentence shall, subject to the provisions hereinbefore contained, take effect
immediately.
(2) When a sentence of imprisonment for a term is passed under this Code on an escaped
convict,—
(a) if such sentence is severer in kind than the sentence which such convict was
undergoing when he escaped, the new sentence shall take effect immediately;
(b) if such sentence is not severer in kind than the sentence which such convict was
undergoing when he escaped, the new sentence shall take effect after he has suffered
imprisonment for a further period equal to that which, at the time of his escape, remained
unexpired of his former sentence.
(3) For the purposes of sub-section (2), a sentence of rigorous imprisonment shall be deemed to
be severer in kind than a sentence of simple imprisonment.
427. Sentence on offender already sentenced for another offence.
(1) When a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is sentenced on a subsequent
conviction to imprisonment or imprisonment for life, such imprisonment or imprisonment for life
shall commence at the expiration of the imprisonment to which he has been previously
sentenced, unless the Court directs that the subsequent sentence shall run concurrently with such
previous sentence:
Provided that where a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment by an order under
section 122 in default of furnishing security is, whilst undergoing such sentence, sentenced to
imprisonment for an offence committed prior to the making of such order, the latter sentence
shall commence immediately.
(2) When a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment for life is sentenced on a
subsequent conviction to imprisonment for a term or imprisonment for life, the subsequent
sentence shall run concurrently with such previous sentence.
STATE AMENDMENT
Tamil Nadu:
In section 247 after sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:—
"(1A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), when a person already undergoing
a sentence of imprisonment is sentenced on a subsequent conviction to imprisonment under subsection
(2) of section 380 of the Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860), for an offence of
theft of any idol or icon in any building used as a place of worship, such imprisonment shall
commence at the expiration of the imprisonment to which he has been previously sentenced".
[Vide Tamil Nadu Act 28 of 1993, sec. 6.
428. Period of detention undergone by the accused to be set off against the sentence of
imprisonment.
Where an accused person has, on conviction, been sentenced to imprisonment for a term , not
being imprisonment in default of payment of fine, the period of detention, if any, undergone by
him during the investigation, inquiry or trial of the same case and before the date of such
conviction shall be set off against the term of imprisonment imposed on him on such conviction,
and the liability of such person to undergo imprisonment on such conviction shall be restricted to
the remainder, if any, of the term of imprisonment imposed on him.
Comments
(i) Benefit of set off under section 428 is not available to life convicts; Kartar Singh v. State of
Haryana, AIR 1982 SC 1433.
(ii) The period of detention referred to in section 428 is of the accused person during the
investigation; Ram Sarup v. Union of India, 1988 Cr LJ 417: AIR 1988 SC 283.
429. Saving.
(1) Nothing in section 426 or section 427 shall be held to excuse any person from any part of the
punishment to which he is liable upon his former or subsequent conviction.
(2) When an award of imprisonment in default of payment of a fine is annexed to a substantive
sentence of imprisonment and the person undergoing the sentence is after its execution to
undergo a further substantive sentence or further substantive sentences of imprisonment, effect
shall not be given to the award of imprisonment in default of payment of the fine until the person
has undergone the further sentence or sentences.
430. Return of warrant on execution of sentence.
When a sentence has been fully executed, the officer executing it shall return the warrant to the
Court from which it is issued, with an endorsement under his hand certifying the manner in
which the sentence has been executed.
431. Money ordered to be paid recoverable as a fine.
Any money (other than a fine) payable by virtue of any order made under this Code, and the
method of recovery of which is not otherwise expressly provided for, shall be recoverable as if it
were a fine:
Provided that section 421 shall, in its application to an order under section 359, by virtue of this
section, be construed as if in the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 421, after the words and
figures "under section 357", the words and figures "or an order for payment of costs under
section 359" had been inserted.
(2) Whenever an application is made to the appropriate Government for the suspension or
remission of a sentence, the appropriate Government may require the presiding Judge of the
Court before or by which the conviction was had or confirmed, to state his opinion as to whether
the application should be granted or refused, together with his reasons for such opinion and also
to forward with the statement of such opinion a certified copy of the record of the trial or of such
record thereof as exists.
(3) If any condition on which a sentence has been suspended or remitted is, in the opinion of the
appropriate Government, not fulfilled, the appropriate Government may cancel the suspension or
remission, and thereupon the person in whose favour the sentence has been suspended or
remitted may, if at large, be arrested by any police officer, without warrant and remanded to
undergo the unexpired portion of the sentence.
(4) The condition on which a sentence is suspended or remitted under this section may be one to
be fulfilled by the person in whose favour the sentence is suspended or remitted, or one
independent of his will (5) The appropriate Government may, by general rules or special orders,
give directions as to the suspension of sentences and the conditions on which petitions should be
presented and dealt with:
Provided that in the case of any sentence (other than a sentence of fine ) passed on a male
person above the age of eighteen years, no such petition by the person sentenced or by any other
person on his behalf shall be entertained, unless the person sentenced is in jail, and,—
(a) where such petition is made by the person sentenced, it is presented through the
officer in charge of the jail; or
(b) where such petition is made by any other person, it contains a declaration that the
person sentenced is in jail.
(6) The provisions of the above sub-sections shall also apply to any order passed by a Criminal
Court under any section of this Code or of any other law which restricts the liberty of any person
or imposes any liability upon him or his property.
(7) In this section and in section 433, the expression "appropriate Government" means,—
(a) in cases where the sentence is for an offence against, or the order referred to in sub-section
(6) is passed under, any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union
extends, the Central Government;
(b) in other cases the Government of the State within which the offender is
sentenced or the said order is passed.
Comments
When accused is a primary school teacher with no bad antecedent and amount robbed by him
was a trivial amount and there was resistance in his arrest on any attempt to conceal his identity,
the Government may remit or reduce sentence in exercise of power of clemency; Ram Shankar v.
State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR, 1981 SC 644: (1981) Cr LJ 162: (1981) SCC (Cr) 378.
433. Power to commute sentence.
The appropriate Government may, without the consent of the person sentenced commute—
(a) a sentence of death, for any other punishment provided by the Indian Penal Code (45
of 1860);
(b) a sentence of imprisonment for life, for imprisonment for a term not exceeding
fourteen years or for fine;
(c) a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for simple imprisonment for any term to which
that person might have been sentenced, or for fine;
(d) a sentence of simple imprisonment, for fine.
Comments
Even where Supreme Court upheld validity of section 433, Government cannot reduce or
commute sentence to less than 14 years for weighty reasons as the crime was serious;
Shidagauda Nilgappa Ghandakar v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1981 SC 764: (1981) Cr LJ 324:
(1981) SCC (Cr) 163: (1981) Cr LR (SC) 112.
433A. Restriction on powers of remission or commutation in certain cases.
Notwithstanding anything contained in section 432, where a sentence of imprisonment for life is
imposed on conviction of a person for an offence for which death is one of the punishment
provided by laws or where a sentence of death imposed on a person has been commuted under
section 433 into one of imprisonment for life, such person shall not be released from prison
unless he had served at least fourteen years of imprisonment.
Comments
To read down or interpret section 433A of the Code with the aid of the changes proposed by the
Indian Penal Code (Amendment ) Bill would tantamount to hearing the provisions of the said bill
as forming part of the Indian Penal Code which is clearly impermissible. To put such an
interpretation with the aid of such extrinsic material would result in violence to the plain
language of section 433A of the Code; Ashok Kumar v. Union of India, 1991 Cr LJ 2483 (SC)
434. Concurrent power of Central Government in case of death sentences.
The powers conferred by sections 432 and 433 upon the State Government may, in the case of
sentences of death, also be exercised by the Central Government.
435. State Government to act after consultation with Central Government in certain cases.
(1) The powers conferred by sections 432 and 433 upon the State Government to remit or
commute a sentence, in any case where the sentence is for an offence—
(a) which was investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment constituted under
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), or by any other agency
empowered to make investigation into an offence under any Central Act other than this
Code, or
(b) which involved the misappropriation or destruction of, or damage to, any property
belonging to the Central Government, or
(c) which was committed by a person in the service of the Central Government, while
acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty.
shall not be exercised by the State Government except after consultation with the Central
Government.